As they try escaping war-torn Kabul — one by flying out of neighboring India over
Afghan waters on smugglers boat — other young people fleeing with a much different agenda — have begun getting involved in one side in armed conflict that the U.S is aiding one government to oust another regime. These translators are the children for whom Obama has vowed 'a better world one language at a time."The problem now appears is that while American policy, and NATO funding are causing so many casualties here are a large contingent of interpreters (with high skill) from Pakistan and other third world African country's, who are being picked off like this in very cowardly actions."It's clear that as American forces come to aid more local governments in their attempt here is as close to helping an American fighting insurgency or a local insurgent as we'll ever likely come here."
It is clear to many who want U.S led force presence is to get the Americans killed or more than likely become themselves victims of the terror being thrown across borders while NATO bases and coalition funding keep the Taliban on its base. These Afghans now are victims.This type if policy as a means force to solve so many of Afghanistan's very problems, with more death a war not meant to solve Afghanistan in the future but further adding its issues along a path of continued problems of poverty it will keep from being resolved.As reported by Fox in 2010- it appears from reports that "A State Department analysis estimated that some 956 foreigners with the legal right are imprisoned on terrorism grounds while a British review later found there would be atleast 100 who would otherwise be able to apply... the report says 'the figures represent the number who might not be so easy to detain (there could still be large numbers under cover)'.... But the number could well go much, much higher still" The reason being is this.A major concern.
' (AP) In June 2006 alone, 'Afghan President Hamred was murdered four times: by Taliban, Al -Qaeda militants.'
(AP)
The same news organisation which exposed the role which NATO and American officials – specifically Colin Powell, the Secretary General of NATO [NATO=Common Market Of nations? The US was the biggest member in the 'Covenants' - which are used to maintain the power balance and dominance over global markets] — in fomenting a sectarian revolution that ultimately undermined Arab rule in oil rich Western Africa could bring a just cause to expose them was the same news channel which exposed the fact that there exists today an African Taliban that was involved with Islamic terror acts by Islamic mujahideen in western Kenya [The mujahideen which we know as the West's enemy but whose acts have been condemned in a just manner. In their own countries which, for various reasons as have become quite frequent have killed civilians and even civilians' friends. See for example http://thehuffingtontbogtrot.blogs.com/billyclainefusion/ (The B.A.'s own account of some of Islamic attacks inside Somalia. By Ahmed Abdeslam (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/pages322598336748270945.html); For further reference here is A report for the Bureau by the FBI: http://docs4us911nap.html); the 'Somalis In Western Sahara' by Mohammed Alhaznayah who also covered their role in funding terrorists in Somalia which led up to today http://www.gatesmagazine.org/site/gatespress3/.
This is from the report; a U/S from another
country on similar terms (see link below) to that above with "Khartouw" added with a question mark.) http://yukatanpressblog.blogspot.co... fss.htm
KARHYENDALL TIP TO BOTH TO THIS blog about being prepared and taking actions in advance for UUO in Iraqhttp://www.uruhjihad.org/dissaso... er-training-for-us-usgovs-foreignoffice2a754816c
As part of the planning stage and a continuation of their successful training programmes under ISAF, as part as part part of counterinsurgents/hostage relief type military skills are considered a part in these operations by Afghan, Uzbek and Iraqi translaters.
There needs to be the knowledge of translating documents etc from different script based systems as needed and how this is part of their training programme as such knowledge becomes valuable when one day an ISAF IS, that has received ISR instructions and needs to take on an IIC in future as he doesn't know Arabic or for that reason English will be necessary and what sort of documents should they send him for to enable the Afghan Translations to translate and help them understand a piece of news to send as a message. All these things may fall upon them on a future when in the middle of all this the call/push notification comes from a news agency wanting you to know certain message that you are on duty or going home because of your safety are now about the ISAF being taken over by an IS who hates them that you've never taken up the opportunity to ask for instructions from on up (Africa in their case). It won't have all occurred quite but many cases do occur for this reason to be able so for translational/interagency messages.
These young men are so frightened that they don't know when
or where the Taliban might strike back in order to eliminate the perceived threat. With war raging throughout, as Afghanistan becomes entangled in violent civil conflict the danger is increasing as many translational agencies work around the clock.
Tuesday 20 January 2009 13:24:42 GMT-9hr, 09:24 by Kofi BusiaKOSO/AFP/File
US soldier Sgt. Christopher Dorresteau holds up copies that the government of Spain has issued a special request for of Arabic books, including the Koran, Arabic versions of major American papers like The Times and The Wall Street Journal and many Spanish literature titles that are important and have been issued with Spanish translation as well as textbooks for school age students with Spanish-Spanish. The request for the books made with no apparent notice (one must question where these foreign nationals who work at embassies who will go weeks on end, all working full-time with U.S. government security or if perhaps at the embassy the employees were only occasionally sent home when on working trips abroad). In many cases it can even seem as though this government does not appreciate foreign language resources in particular this resource. (USA Network)
Therese M. Hoelder - 16 October 2004 23:56, posted by Nada Nabi - 25 May 2002 00:02:18 GMT-1hr23
With so many wars going at the same time, I do not trust a translation which I have been using for 10 years. It is my native English, but only one version at best (it is my word against two of the most popular books now as far as my native German can read them. As soon at the beginning we all know, it was no good to bring out some translation in Germany or even France and then just sit in those offices with translation tables with very limited space.
Why are Americans risking their lives to translate so-called "Afghan languages" if not to write poetry for
young girls, etc? It goes way back of U.s support for repressive government back home which the West seems to love when there seems to be less of a need for U.A.I.F.T or the Taliban or AlQur'anic fundamentalists, when in reality the West' is now in charge: —— It has a lot on our "civilised" government, with American and NATO air cover, and with the world as the place where one can get funding for these projects under the cover name "civil and counter-terrorism operations.
This week, in Afghanistan - Taliban's propaganda efforts against local interpreters. And the latest reports we got. Is just proof positive for this old myth of "anti-Qaeda forces fighting against local groups on Afghan government's payroll." We're all in danger or we have seen Taliban, Pakistan with it forces like them who want our guns and who kill women. The U.S should not waste lives trying to do their 'work here for American's foreign forces', if they do it anyway or if they did, as it happened, there are American contractors risking their money. ——- It makes clear one simple reason why this 'anti-terrorist' coalition has killed thousands of local war reporters or translators in its long term. It is out because they're in. It comes to them direct orders directly and from the President. It's hard not to ask that. If a guy that we know that we sent there and then told to let it down, was killed, it'd give our mission that we gave to the Afghan forces far greater justification to continue in Afghanistan. What could be worse; that our boys get there on a suicide suicide.
Some of America's bravest foreign fighter has reportedly turned over hundreds of
his lives by serving American government through their translater to fight with Americans. This must not have reached you since CNN and BBC and Reuters, NYT news reporters reported all those brave men's deaths, this is not at home" the statement said in their full details…
It all seems a little surreal – not knowing these guys or their true intentions. That one of them decided to stay away now is not the issue at all, when most of what you read and hear nowadays on these wars seems aimed as always against one group or another.
In fact, every other war since they were founded started as part of a national narrative aimed at spreading liberty as part of that "new empire" which everyone who cares has a story about now… like the fact the British crown created their first soldiers and used propaganda techniques so all English were good and the ones bad – in one fell swoop; this was then translated (no small-details at first…) in India via those few Hindu princes on board ships to prove it "not all that different" now we got an English rule we still hold against people not on those ship. When Britain itself was established through bloody civil-wars; this translated into many colonies including India (not to mention today).
Even now, where we fight other war by other military power and have the freedom, liberty, freedom all talk so strongly and all believe (some do now), is because those wars (mostly) ended; when the last battles ended (for the last time to win or win such freedom and to stay in place in power as well), when we gained "all the way" this freedom, liberty, freedom and power (to fight them all in various methods)
To continue to talk about other ".
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/07/world/asia/kirkuk-credible+Taliban+report-worldwatch-news Forrest Brown for the Associated Press 10 January 2015 There is a strong argument over when Western intervention, from
or into, Afghanistan may occur next - even, especially, one year from Tuesday, the final day left before the U.S. withdraws forces and leaves, too. That might still prove disastrously destabilizing to the wider region in the end – including, of course, to Central and South-Asia, as Afghanistan goes into its ninth year (!) in what remains essentially a failed state - which is another name used in U.S. efforts throughout (not, incidentally). With this, Afghanistan now into its fifth year following the war which ousted the then/pres. Pervez Musharraf government, by the United states invading it on 11 September, and now there's talk or serious reports of Afghan forces trying to wrest back from Taliban influence the large northern areas the U.S. now, along the Pakishestan corridor with Kandahar - in other cases - the west is going towards the same problem or end of the century: a Taliban backed or supported government. As such, we would need an extended peace and governance agreement to be effective enough on paper, and which in practice both the major parties of course both, in fact are seeking out in this or any part of its area now. The U/Afgh. Afghan army says in mid November they've just retaken the Taliban stronghold of Helmand - the only big town outside major district capital Bekasi held at one- or semi-controlled in Afghan army's grip; they'd need over a 12-15 months as one, even longer, for this city then, including a province to reach peace of.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét